Two ways in · one shared record · one rate card

Agent teams that carry the work.A coding agent that costs 60% less.

Both run on the same vetted, US-hosted open weight models, write to the same decision ledger, and bill the same meter. Start with whichever problem is louder this quarter. The other one is already here when you need it.

30 minutes with the founder · bring a repo and a backlog, or your usage export

If the work is louder

Agent Teams, managed like your engineering team.

Six named Workers carry a ticket from the backlog to a merged pull request. You approve the plan, read the review, and loosen the gates as the record earns it.

Here for the bill instead →

01 · Meet the Workers

Six crafts. One Team.

Each Worker has a job, a boundary it never crosses, and a place on the record. Every one of them starts at Training.

02 · One ticket, start to finish

Watch one work item cross the Team.

A ticket comes off your backlog and moves proposal, plan, build, review, test, report. Every step is credited to the Worker that did it, every gate waits for a person, and the whole thing is on the record when it is done.

Frontend Team · NMT-214 · add a geolocation providerITEM COST $1.84
  1. baileyproposed from the Jira backlog · NMT-214 · add a geolocation provider · evidence attached
  2. slackPM tagged in #eng-frontend · business rule added: fall back to postal code when GPS is denied
  3. youproposal accepted · start planning
  4. wrightplan drafted in a sandbox · 3 questions for you, 2 answered from the decision ledger
  5. reevecritique: index the lookup table · wording tightened · no other concerns
  6. youplan approved · one edit
  7. wrightbuilt · 14 tests added · draft PR #482 opened
  8. proctorreview: 2 findings, security and db · both fixed by Wright · approved
  9. fletcherapp booted in a sandbox · 6-step test plan · video and 9 screenshots attached
  10. youresult accepted · merged
  11. harperstandup posted to #eng-frontend · NMT-214 shipped · receipts attached
  12. The Team waits here. The plan is yours to approve.
proposal · plan · build · review rounds · browser test · report · every gate answered by a person

03 · Manage them like your team

Teams that mirror your org. Autonomy that is earned.

A Team mirrors one of your engineering teams, never a repository, with its own repos, Playbook, budget, sandbox, and one accountable person. A Worker serves it through an Engagement: when it runs, what it may do alone, and what it knows here. Proctor can approve on the web app and only advise on the infrastructure repo.

Every Engagement starts at Training. Promotion is a button you press when the track record supports it, never a switch it flips itself, and merges and anything irreversible stay gated at every rung.

promoted per Engagement, on the record · the floor on irreversible acts never moves

Frontend Teamweb app · design system · 2 repos
reports to Sam
  • baileysupervised
  • reevetraining
  • wrighttraining
  • proctorautonomous
  • fletchertraining
  • harpersupervised
Backend Teamclaims API · pricing · 4 repos
reports to Marcus
  • baileytraining
  • reevesupervised
  • wrighttraining
  • proctorautonomous
  • harpersupervised

two Teams · one shared decision ledger · each Engagement on its own rung

04 · The system of context

The plan, the decision, and the rule live in one place.

Every plan, every answered question, and every decision behind a merge lands in one shared record that the next plan reads first. The Playbook is where judgment becomes rules: a domain expert writes the pricing formula in plain words, an engineer writes the migration guardrail, and when your decisions show a pattern the Team proposes the rule for a person to adopt or dismiss.

It is your knowledge, not ours. Export it to Confluence or Drive any time.

05 · Start with one gate

Already running your own factory? Add a gate.

Three Workers only check output and never change code. Engage one on one repository beside whatever you run today, at a fraction of a frontier-model reviewer's cost. The builders join when the record earns it.

If the bill is louder

YAGNI Code. The same models, 60% or more under frontier rates.

A drop-in desktop and CLI coding agent, or the Claude Code and Codex your engineers already run, routed through YAGNI with one command. Nothing else about the workflow changes.

Here for the Teams instead →

YAGNI Code · desktop, CLI, or the harness you have

Seats are becoming API rates. Keep the workflow, cut the bill.

Frontier vendors are moving growing teams off flat subscriptions and onto usage pricing. At those rates a power user clears$9,000 a month and a typical developer runs near $4,000, for the work your team already does today.

Adoption is not the problem. When most of your PRs are agent-touched, the spend scales with your best habits. The bill is the problem, and it is the one thing here that does not need a new workflow to fix.

Pilot free with two or three developers beside the agent they use today, andread the comparison from your own sessions, not our deck.

06 · We meet you where you are

Either way, nobody is asked to move.

07 · Run it like an admin

Built to pass your security review.

Read the security overview →Open the trust portal →

08 · Pricing

One meter. Developers and Workers alike.

One rate card with four lanes, metered per token, the same for an engineer in YAGNI Code and a Worker on a Team, at 60% or more under comparable frontier API rates. No seats, no platform fee, humans free. Caps per Worker and per day keep it predictable, and the rates are shared on the call.

Thirty days, one repo, your backlog

Bring one repo and a backlog. Meet the Team that takes it.

On the call we connect a repository and a backlog, engage the first Workers at Training, and leave the first work item at your proposal gate. The record starts that day.

30 minutes with Jack, the founder · no migration project on the other side